Data Centers
Where your servers live
Two carrier-grade facilities on two continents, chosen for connectivity, stability and privacy-friendly jurisdictions.
~8 ms
avg. EU latency
π©πͺ
Frankfurt am Main β FRA1
Germany, European Union
- βConnectivity: Direct DE-CIX peering, 3+ Tier-1 carriers
- βPower: 2N redundant, 100% renewable
- βCooling: N+1 chilled water, hot-aisle containment
- βSecurity: 24/7 on-site guards, biometric access, CCTV
- βCompliance: GDPR, ISO 27001, ISO 9001
~12 ms
avg. NA latency
π¨π¦
Montreal, Quebec β YUL1
Canada, North America
- βConnectivity: QIX peering, low-latency routes to US East
- βPower: 2N redundant, hydroelectric (Hydro-QuΓ©bec)
- βCooling: Free-air cooling most of the year
- βSecurity: 24/7 on-site staff, mantrap entry, CCTV
- βCompliance: SOC 2 Type II, PIPEDA
Which location should I choose?
| Your users are in⦠| Recommended | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Europe, Middle East, Africa | π©πͺ Frankfurt | DE-CIX peering gives single-digit latency across the EU and excellent routes to MENA. |
| North & South America | π¨π¦ Montreal | ~10 ms to New York, ~20 ms to Toronto/Chicago, strong routes south. |
| Worldwide audience | Both | Run a server in each region and route users to the nearest one. |
| Privacy-sensitive workloads | Either | GDPR (Germany) and PIPEDA (Canada) are among the strongest privacy frameworks in the world. |
Test the network yourself
Check live status and current network performance of both facilities.
View Network Status